Aruba vs British Virgin Islands: Fish landings and discards
Aruba
2.96
in 2018
British Virgin Islands
1.42
in 2018
Aruba rank
150th
British Virgin Islands rank
151st
Fish landings and discards over time
- Aruba
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.96 against 1.42 in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 1.54.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.1 times British Virgin Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1994 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.
Aruba ranks 150th and British Virgin Islands ranks 151st of 157 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.46 | 4.45 | 3.01 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 4.71 | 1.23 | 3.48 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 2.97 | 1.51 | 1.46 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish landings and discards, Aruba or British Virgin Islands?
- Aruba, at 2.96 against 1.42 in British Virgin Islands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in fish landings and discards between Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 1.54, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Aruba and British Virgin Islands rank globally for fish landings and discards?
- Aruba ranks 150th and British Virgin Islands ranks 151st of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fish landings and discards. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.