Aruba vs Togo: Fish discards
Aruba
2.96
in 2018
Togo
1.21
in 2018
Aruba rank
152nd
Togo rank
154th
Fish discards over time
- Aruba
- Togo
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.96 against 1.21 in Togo, a difference of 1.75.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.5 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1959 it was Togo ahead.
Aruba ranks 152nd and Togo ranks 154th of 161 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 6.15 | 96 | 89.85 | Togo |
| 1960s | 6.72 | 119.39 | 112.67 | Togo |
| 1970s | 16.55 | 244.67 | 228.12 | Togo |
| 1980s | 17.32 | 424.44 | 407.12 | Togo |
| 1990s | 8.78 | 415.14 | 406.36 | Togo |
| 2000s | 4.71 | 194.73 | 190.02 | Togo |
| 2010s | 2.97 | 152.55 | 149.58 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish discards, Aruba or Togo?
- Aruba, at 2.96 against 1.21 in Togo as of 2018.
- What is the difference in fish discards between Aruba and Togo?
- 1.75, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Togo?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1959 to 2018.
- How do Aruba and Togo rank globally for fish discards?
- Aruba ranks 152nd and Togo ranks 154th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish discards. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Discards are animals thrown back (alive or dead) into the sea after being caught during fishing activities. This represents bycatch (fish caught unintentionally) that is not brought ashore for use.