Cote d'Ivoire vs Sierra Leone: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita

Cote d'Ivoire
23.7 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sierra Leone
24.45 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
62nd
Sierra Leone rank
59th

Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sierra Leone
101520253035196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 24.45 kilograms per year per capita against 23.7 kilograms per year per capita in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.75 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 62nd and Sierra Leone ranks 59th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 14.95 kilograms per year per capita 14.63 kilograms per year per capita 0.3231 kilograms per year per capita Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 18.68 kilograms per year per capita 22.18 kilograms per year per capita 3.5 kilograms per year per capita Sierra Leone
1980s 18.76 kilograms per year per capita 17.19 kilograms per year per capita 1.57 kilograms per year per capita Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 14.52 kilograms per year per capita 13.26 kilograms per year per capita 1.26 kilograms per year per capita Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 13.25 kilograms per year per capita 23.13 kilograms per year per capita 9.87 kilograms per year per capita Sierra Leone
2010s 17.31 kilograms per year per capita 29.09 kilograms per year per capita 11.79 kilograms per year per capita Sierra Leone
2020s 24.23 kilograms per year per capita 25.14 kilograms per year per capita 0.9125 kilograms per year per capita Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita, Cote d'Ivoire or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 24.45 kilograms per year per capita against 23.7 kilograms per year per capita in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita between Cote d'Ivoire and Sierra Leone?
0.75 kilograms per year per capita, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sierra Leone rank globally for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 62nd and Sierra Leone ranks 59th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sierra Leone: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/cote-d-ivoire/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/cote-d-ivoire/sierra-leone/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sierra Leone: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.