Antigua and Barbuda vs Portugal: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
54.51 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Portugal
53.49 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
7th
Portugal rank
8th

Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Portugal
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 54.51 kilograms per year per capita against 53.49 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal, a difference of 1.02 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 7th and Portugal ranks 8th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 34.34 kilograms per year per capita 59.08 kilograms per year per capita 24.73 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1970s 39.98 kilograms per year per capita 47.61 kilograms per year per capita 7.62 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1980s 44.73 kilograms per year per capita 45.66 kilograms per year per capita 0.936 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
1990s 38.39 kilograms per year per capita 59.51 kilograms per year per capita 21.12 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2000s 53.29 kilograms per year per capita 55.6 kilograms per year per capita 2.31 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2010s 55.46 kilograms per year per capita 56.48 kilograms per year per capita 1.02 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2020s 54.95 kilograms per year per capita 53.51 kilograms per year per capita 1.44 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Portugal?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 54.51 kilograms per year per capita against 53.49 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Portugal?
1.02 kilograms per year per capita, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Portugal rank globally for fish and seafood consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 7th and Portugal ranks 8th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Portugal: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/portugal/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Portugal: Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fish and seafood consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.