Iceland vs Tunisia: Wild fish catch by gear type
Iceland
24,931
in 2018
Tunisia
21,654
in 2018
Iceland rank
33rd
Tunisia rank
35th
Wild fish catch by gear type over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 24,931 against 21,654 in Tunisia, a difference of 3,277.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 69 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Tunisia ahead.
Iceland ranks 33rd and Tunisia ranks 35th of 123 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3,968 | 3,262 | 705.53 | Iceland |
| 1960s | 6,999 | 5,765 | 1,234 | Iceland |
| 1970s | 28,221 | 9,706 | 18,515 | Iceland |
| 1980s | 29,517 | 16,045 | 13,473 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 21,489 | 19,266 | 2,223 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 19,020 | 24,343 | 5,323 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 29,907 | 23,738 | 6,169 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch by gear type, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Iceland, at 24,931 against 21,654 in Tunisia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch by gear type between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 3,277, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 69 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for wild fish catch by gear type?
- Iceland ranks 33rd and Tunisia ranks 35th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch by gear type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.