China vs Latvia: Wild fish catch by gear type
China
39,840
in 2018
Latvia
53,403
in 2018
China rank
26th
Latvia rank
23rd
Wild fish catch by gear type over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 53,403 against 39,840 in China, a difference of 13,563.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times China's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 23rd of 123 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 25,265 | 219,659 | 194,394 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 22,664 | 86,380 | 63,717 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 115,638 | 58,865 | 56,774 | China |
| 2010s | 235,792 | 49,446 | 186,346 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch by gear type, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 53,403 against 39,840 in China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch by gear type between China and Latvia?
- 13,563, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2018.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for wild fish catch by gear type?
- China ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 23rd of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch by gear type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.