Aruba vs Samoa: Wild fish catch by gear type
Aruba
54.5
in 2002
Samoa
55.24
in 2018
Aruba rank
94th
Samoa rank
93rd
Wild fish catch by gear type over time
- Aruba
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 55.24 against 54.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.74.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 94th and Samoa ranks 93rd of 123 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 121.04 | 42.21 | 78.82 | Aruba |
| 1980s | 138.68 | 43.71 | 94.97 | Aruba |
| 1990s | 56.07 | 36.62 | 19.45 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 58.37 | 40.4 | 17.97 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish catch by gear type, Aruba or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 55.24 against 54.5 in Aruba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in wild fish catch by gear type between Aruba and Samoa?
- 0.74, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Samoa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2002.
- How do Aruba and Samoa rank globally for wild fish catch by gear type?
- Aruba ranks 94th and Samoa ranks 93rd of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Wild fish catch by gear type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.