Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fish and seafood consumption per capita

Hungary
6.46 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
6.4 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Hungary rank
146th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
148th

Fish and seafood consumption per capita over time

  • Hungary
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
051015196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 6.46 kilograms per year per capita against 6.4 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.06 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Hungary ranks 146th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 148th of 192 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 3.39 kilograms per year per capita 8.8 kilograms per year per capita 5.41 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 3.86 kilograms per year per capita 12.25 kilograms per year per capita 8.39 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 4.87 kilograms per year per capita 13.03 kilograms per year per capita 8.16 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 3.51 kilograms per year per capita 10.77 kilograms per year per capita 7.26 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 4.93 kilograms per year per capita 7.03 kilograms per year per capita 2.1 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 5.7 kilograms per year per capita 6.75 kilograms per year per capita 1.06 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 6.45 kilograms per year per capita 6.69 kilograms per year per capita 0.2375 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fish and seafood consumption per capita, Hungary or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Hungary, at 6.46 kilograms per year per capita against 6.4 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption per capita between Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for fish and seafood consumption per capita?
Hungary ranks 146th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 148th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-and-seafood-consumption-per-capita/hungary/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-and-seafood-consumption-per-capita/hungary/tanzania/">Hungary vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fish and seafood consumption per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fish and seafood consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.