Denmark vs Qatar: Fish and seafood consumption per capita
Denmark
22.56 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
22.03 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Denmark rank
68th
Qatar rank
70th
Fish and seafood consumption per capita over time
- Denmark
- Qatar
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 22.56 kilograms per year per capita against 22.03 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar, a difference of 0.53 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Qatar ahead.
Denmark ranks 68th and Qatar ranks 70th of 192 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.07 kilograms per year per capita | 23.45 kilograms per year per capita | 0.3799 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 22.8 kilograms per year per capita | 22.86 kilograms per year per capita | 0.0574 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish and seafood consumption per capita, Denmark or Qatar?
- Denmark, at 22.56 kilograms per year per capita against 22.03 kilograms per year per capita in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption per capita between Denmark and Qatar?
- 0.53 kilograms per year per capita, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Qatar rank globally for fish and seafood consumption per capita?
- Denmark ranks 68th and Qatar ranks 70th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.