Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fish and seafood consumption per capita

Cameroon
18.12 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
17.96 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Cameroon rank
83rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
85th

Fish and seafood consumption per capita over time

  • Cameroon
  • Trinidad and Tobago
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 18.12 kilograms per year per capita against 17.96 kilograms per year per capita in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.16 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Cameroon ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 11.3 kilograms per year per capita 13.74 kilograms per year per capita 2.44 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 10.24 kilograms per year per capita 10.98 kilograms per year per capita 0.7369 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 12.99 kilograms per year per capita 14.53 kilograms per year per capita 1.54 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 11.29 kilograms per year per capita 10.54 kilograms per year per capita 0.7575 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon
2000s 15.58 kilograms per year per capita 18.52 kilograms per year per capita 2.94 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 20.43 kilograms per year per capita 20.78 kilograms per year per capita 0.3489 kilograms per year per capita Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 18.94 kilograms per year per capita 18.46 kilograms per year per capita 0.4775 kilograms per year per capita Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fish and seafood consumption per capita, Cameroon or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cameroon, at 18.12 kilograms per year per capita against 17.96 kilograms per year per capita in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption per capita between Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.16 kilograms per year per capita, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for fish and seafood consumption per capita?
Cameroon ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-and-seafood-consumption-per-capita/cameroon/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-and-seafood-consumption-per-capita/cameroon/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fish and seafood consumption per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fish and seafood consumption per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.