Belarus vs Libya: Fish and seafood consumption per capita
Belarus
12.46 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya
12.88 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Belarus rank
112th
Libya rank
109th
Fish and seafood consumption per capita over time
- Belarus
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 12.88 kilograms per year per capita against 12.46 kilograms per year per capita in Belarus, a difference of 0.42 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 112th and Libya ranks 109th of 192 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.7 kilograms per year per capita | 19.27 kilograms per year per capita | 5.57 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 12.32 kilograms per year per capita | 13.88 kilograms per year per capita | 1.57 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish and seafood consumption per capita, Belarus or Libya?
- Libya, at 12.88 kilograms per year per capita against 12.46 kilograms per year per capita in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fish and seafood consumption per capita between Belarus and Libya?
- 0.42 kilograms per year per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Libya rank globally for fish and seafood consumption per capita?
- Belarus ranks 112th and Libya ranks 109th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Fish and seafood consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.