North Macedonia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP
North Macedonia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 1997
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
9th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
10th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- North Macedonia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 9th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 10th of 113 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp, North Macedonia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- North Macedonia, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 1997.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp between North Macedonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1997.
- How do North Macedonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- North Macedonia ranks 9th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 10th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.