Gambia vs Namibia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP
Gambia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2007
Gambia rank
17th
Namibia rank
20th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- Gambia
- Namibia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 20th of 113 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp, Gambia or Namibia?
- Gambia, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Namibia?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Gambia and Namibia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 20th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.