Croatia vs Zambia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP
Croatia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Zambia
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Croatia rank
58th
Zambia rank
56th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- Croatia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Croatia, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 56th of 113 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp, Croatia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp between Croatia and Zambia?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Croatia ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 56th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.