Canada vs Germany: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP
Canada
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Germany
0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP
in 1979
Canada rank
107th
Germany rank
106th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP over time
- Canada
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 107th and Germany ranks 106th of 113 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Canada |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp, Canada or Germany?
- Germany, at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 1979.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp between Canada and Germany?
- 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Germany?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 1979.
- How do Canada and Germany rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 107th and Germany ranks 106th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.