Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
15th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sudan ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 117 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Sudan ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.