Namibia vs Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Namibia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Uruguay
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2004
Namibia rank
101st
Uruguay rank
101st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Namibia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 101st of 117 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Namibia or Uruguay?
- Namibia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay as of 2009.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Namibia and Uruguay?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Namibia ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 101st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.