Latvia vs Namibia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Latvia rank
101st
Namibia rank
101st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 101st of 117 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2009.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 101st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.