Japan vs Latvia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Japan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan rank
100th
Latvia rank
101st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Latvia ahead.
Japan ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 101st of 117 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Japan or Latvia?
- Japan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Japan and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Japan ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 101st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.