Germany vs Rwanda: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Germany
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 1980
Rwanda
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2006
Germany rank
101st
Rwanda rank
101st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Germany
- Rwanda
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Germany ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 101st of 117 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Germany or Rwanda?
- Germany, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 1980.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Germany and Rwanda?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1980.
- How do Germany and Rwanda rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Germany ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 101st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.