Denmark vs Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Uruguay
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2004
Denmark rank
101st
Uruguay rank
101st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Uruguay
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 101st of 117 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Uruguay?
- Denmark, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Uruguay?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
- How do Denmark and Uruguay rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 101st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.