Japan vs Namibia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre
Japan
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0 t per square kilometre
in 2009
Japan rank
101st
Namibia rank
103rd
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Japan
- Namibia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Japan ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre, Japan or Namibia?
- Japan, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre between Japan and Namibia?
- 0 t per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Namibia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Japan and Namibia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — production, per square kilometre?
- Japan ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.