Romania vs South Sudan: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested over time
- Romania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1,690 ha against 1,596 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 94 ha.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Romania ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 120th of 174 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, Romania or South Sudan?
- Romania, at 1,690 ha against 1,596 ha in South Sudan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested between Romania and South Sudan?
- 94 ha, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
- How do Romania and South Sudan rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested?
- Romania ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 120th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.