Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0654 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.063 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
57th
Nicaragua rank
58th

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Nicaragua
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0654 ha per square kilometre against 0.063 ha per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0024 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 58th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0357 ha per square kilometre 0.9604 ha per square kilometre 0.9247 ha per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.0399 ha per square kilometre 1.31 ha per square kilometre 1.27 ha per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0581 ha per square kilometre 0.6967 ha per square kilometre 0.6386 ha per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.0649 ha per square kilometre 0.1533 ha per square kilometre 0.0884 ha per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.0642 ha per square kilometre 0.0571 ha per square kilometre 0.0071 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0647 ha per square kilometre 0.0643 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0657 ha per square kilometre 0.0629 ha per square kilometre 0.0028 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0654 ha per square kilometre against 0.063 ha per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
0.0024 ha per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 58th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/nicaragua/">Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 6,166 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.