Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0654 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0721 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
57th
Mauritius rank
54th

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mauritius
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0721 ha per square kilometre against 0.0654 ha per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0067 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 57th and Mauritius ranks 54th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0357 ha per square kilometre 0.784 ha per square kilometre 0.7483 ha per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0399 ha per square kilometre 0.3027 ha per square kilometre 0.2627 ha per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0581 ha per square kilometre 0.0493 ha per square kilometre 0.0088 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0649 ha per square kilometre 0.0505 ha per square kilometre 0.0143 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0642 ha per square kilometre 0.0531 ha per square kilometre 0.0111 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0647 ha per square kilometre 0.0683 ha per square kilometre 0.0036 ha per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0657 ha per square kilometre 0.0714 ha per square kilometre 0.0056 ha per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0721 ha per square kilometre against 0.0654 ha per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
0.0067 ha per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 57th and Mauritius ranks 54th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 6,166 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.