El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.2582 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2722 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
0246196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2722 ha per square kilometre against 0.2582 ha per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.014 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3.9 ha per square kilometre 0.0626 ha per square kilometre 3.84 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 4.34 ha per square kilometre 0.2979 ha per square kilometre 4.04 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 2.33 ha per square kilometre 0.4703 ha per square kilometre 1.86 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.6913 ha per square kilometre 0.6403 ha per square kilometre 0.051 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.3803 ha per square kilometre 0.8499 ha per square kilometre 0.4697 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.2661 ha per square kilometre 0.4384 ha per square kilometre 0.1723 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.2578 ha per square kilometre 0.3169 ha per square kilometre 0.0591 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2722 ha per square kilometre against 0.2582 ha per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
0.014 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 6,166 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.