Brazil vs Central African Republic: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.2196 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
0.1935 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
30th
Central African Republic rank
33rd

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Central African Republic
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2196 ha per square kilometre against 0.1935 ha per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0261 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 30th and Central African Republic ranks 33rd of 117 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3765 ha per square kilometre 0.2077 ha per square kilometre 0.1688 ha per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.5218 ha per square kilometre 0.2052 ha per square kilometre 0.3166 ha per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.4074 ha per square kilometre 0.1142 ha per square kilometre 0.2932 ha per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.1699 ha per square kilometre 0.0773 ha per square kilometre 0.0926 ha per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.1462 ha per square kilometre 0.0255 ha per square kilometre 0.1208 ha per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.1614 ha per square kilometre 0.0635 ha per square kilometre 0.098 ha per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.2051 ha per square kilometre 0.1644 ha per square kilometre 0.0407 ha per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre, Brazil or Central African Republic?
Brazil, at 0.2196 ha per square kilometre against 0.1935 ha per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre between Brazil and Central African Republic?
0.0261 ha per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Central African Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Central African Republic rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 30th and Central African Republic ranks 33rd of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Central African Republic: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/brazil/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fibre-crops-fibre-equivalent-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/brazil/central-african-republic/">Brazil vs Central African Republic: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 6,166 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.