Sweden vs Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 1987
Uruguay
0 ha per person
in 2004
Sweden rank
100th
Uruguay rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Sweden
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Sweden or Uruguay?
- Sweden, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay as of 1987.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Sweden and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uruguay?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
- How do Sweden and Uruguay rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Sweden ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.