Rwanda vs Sweden: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2013
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 1987
Rwanda rank
100th
Sweden rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Rwanda ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden as of 2013.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.