Namibia vs Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2014
Uruguay
0 ha per person
in 2004
Namibia rank
100th
Uruguay rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Namibia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0022 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Namibia or Uruguay?
- Namibia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Namibia and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Namibia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.