Latvia vs Slovakia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Slovakia
0 ha per person
in 2018
Latvia rank
100th
Slovakia rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Slovakia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Latvia ranks 100th and Slovakia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Latvia or Slovakia?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Latvia and Slovakia?
- 0 ha per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Slovakia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Slovakia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 100th and Slovakia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.