Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0052 ha per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0049 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
21st
Sudan rank
23rd
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0052 ha per person against 0.0049 ha per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Sudan ranks 23rd of 117 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.007 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.004 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0058 ha per person | 0.0059 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0052 ha per person against 0.0049 ha per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Sudan ranks 23rd of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.