Japan vs Portugal: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Portugal
0 ha per person
in 1990
Japan rank
99th
Portugal rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Japan
- Portugal
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 99th and Portugal ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
| 1970s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Portugal |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Portugal |
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Japan or Portugal?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Japan and Portugal?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Portugal?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
- How do Japan and Portugal rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Japan ranks 99th and Portugal ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.