Japan vs Lithuania: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0 ha per person
in 2017
Japan rank
99th
Lithuania rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Lithuania ahead.
Japan ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0025 ha per person | 0.0025 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0014 ha per person | 0.0014 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Japan or Lithuania?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Japan ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.