Japan vs Latvia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Japan rank
99th
Latvia rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Latvia ahead.
Japan ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Japan or Latvia?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Japan and Latvia?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Japan ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.