Germany vs Sweden: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Germany
0 ha per person
in 2013
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 1987
Germany rank
100th
Sweden rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Germany
- Sweden
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Germany |
| 1970s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Germany |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Germany or Sweden?
- Germany, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden as of 2013.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Germany and Sweden?
- 0 ha per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Sweden?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1980.
- How do Germany and Sweden rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Germany ranks 100th and Sweden ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.