Denmark vs Uruguay: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Denmark
0 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 ha per person
in 2004
Denmark rank
100th
Uruguay rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Denmark
- Uruguay
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Denmark or Uruguay?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Denmark and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uruguay?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
- How do Denmark and Uruguay rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Denmark ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.