Croatia vs Namibia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Croatia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2014
Croatia rank
100th
Namibia rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 100th and Namibia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Croatia or Namibia?
- Croatia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Croatia and Namibia?
- 0 ha per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2014.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Namibia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.