Croatia vs Latvia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Croatia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
100th
Latvia rank
100th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0 ha per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 100th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.