Belgium vs France: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita
Belgium
0.0014 ha per person
in 2017
France
0.0017 ha per person
in 2017
Belgium rank
43rd
France rank
41st
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Belgium
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 0.0017 ha per person against 0.0014 ha per person in Belgium, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes France's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 43rd and France ranks 41st of 117 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and France in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita, Belgium or France?
- France, at 0.0017 ha per person against 0.0014 ha per person in Belgium as of 2017.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita between Belgium and France?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and France?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and France rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and France ranks 41st of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.