Namibia vs North Macedonia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Namibia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
North Macedonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1998
Namibia rank
130th
North Macedonia rank
130th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate over time
- Namibia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 130th and North Macedonia ranks 130th of 144 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate, Namibia or North Macedonia?
- Namibia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in North Macedonia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate between Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1998.
- How do Namibia and North Macedonia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Namibia ranks 130th and North Macedonia ranks 130th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.