Croatia vs Namibia: Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Croatia
-60 % change on previous year
in 1998
Namibia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Croatia rank
128th
Namibia rank
130th
Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports -60 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 40 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 144 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate, Croatia or Namibia?
- Croatia, at -60 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 1998.
- What is the difference in fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate between Croatia and Namibia?
- 40 % change on previous year, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1998.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for fibre crops, fibre equivalent — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Croatia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Fibre Crops, Fibre Equivalent — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.