Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Fertilizer use by nutrient
Kyrgyzstan
23,077 tonnes
in 2023
Namibia
20,750 tonnes
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan rank
111th
Namibia rank
113th
Fertilizer use by nutrient over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 23,077 tonnes against 20,750 tonnes in Namibia, a difference of 2,327 tonnes.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,282 tonnes | 100 tonnes | 27,182 tonnes | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 25,388 tonnes | 1,161 tonnes | 24,228 tonnes | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 22,585 tonnes | 12,740 tonnes | 9,845 tonnes | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 23,717 tonnes | 9,476 tonnes | 14,241 tonnes | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer use by nutrient, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 23,077 tonnes against 20,750 tonnes in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizer use by nutrient between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 2,327 tonnes, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for fertilizer use by nutrient?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer use by nutrient. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertilizer use in the agricultural sector, which includes use for crops, livestock, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture.