Kiribati vs Nauru: Fertilizer use by nutrient
Kiribati
0 tonnes
in 2023
Nauru
0 tonnes
in 2023
Kiribati rank
194th
Nauru rank
194th
Fertilizer use by nutrient over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Nauru, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 194th and Nauru ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.25 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 6.25 tonnes | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer use by nutrient, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizer use by nutrient between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 0 tonnes, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for fertilizer use by nutrient?
- Kiribati ranks 194th and Nauru ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer use by nutrient. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertilizer use in the agricultural sector, which includes use for crops, livestock, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture.