Chile vs Serbia: Fertilizer use by nutrient

Chile
244,877 tonnes
in 2023
Serbia
232,221 tonnes
in 2023
Chile rank
41st
Serbia rank
43rd

Fertilizer use by nutrient over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 244,877 tonnes against 232,221 tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 12,656 tonnes.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Chile ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 43rd of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 226,719 tonnes 281,722 tonnes 55,002 tonnes Serbia
2010s 259,120 tonnes 225,982 tonnes 33,138 tonnes Chile
2020s 241,148 tonnes 211,647 tonnes 29,500 tonnes Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizer use by nutrient, Chile or Serbia?
Chile, at 244,877 tonnes against 232,221 tonnes in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fertilizer use by nutrient between Chile and Serbia?
12,656 tonnes, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for fertilizer use by nutrient?
Chile ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer use by nutrient. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizer use by nutrient
Unit
tonnes
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
202 places, 10,271 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fertilizer use in the agricultural sector, which includes use for crops, livestock, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture.