Palau vs Zimbabwe: Fertilizer consumption

Palau
26.67 kilograms per hectare of arable land
in 2023
Zimbabwe
26.21 kilograms per hectare of arable land
in 2023
Palau rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Fertilizer consumption over time

  • Palau
  • Zimbabwe
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Palau currently reports 26.67 kilograms per hectare of arable land against 26.21 kilograms per hectare of arable land in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.46 kilograms per hectare of arable land.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Palau ahead.

Palau ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 199 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 120 kilograms per hectare of arable land 28.8 kilograms per hectare of arable land 91.2 kilograms per hectare of arable land Palau
2010s 99 kilograms per hectare of arable land 28.32 kilograms per hectare of arable land 70.68 kilograms per hectare of arable land Palau
2020s 26.67 kilograms per hectare of arable land 28.51 kilograms per hectare of arable land 1.85 kilograms per hectare of arable land Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizer consumption, Palau or Zimbabwe?
Palau, at 26.67 kilograms per hectare of arable land against 26.21 kilograms per hectare of arable land in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fertilizer consumption between Palau and Zimbabwe?
0.46 kilograms per hectare of arable land, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Zimbabwe?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Palau and Zimbabwe rank globally for fertilizer consumption?
Palau ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palau vs Zimbabwe: Fertilizer consumption. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fertilizer-consumption-kilograms-per-hectare-of-arable-land/palau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fertilizer-consumption-kilograms-per-hectare-of-arable-land/palau/zimbabwe/">Palau vs Zimbabwe: Fertilizer consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)
Unit
kilograms per hectare of arable land
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
246 places, 12,687 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fertilizer consumption measures the quantity of plant nutrients used per unit of arable land. Fertilizer products cover nitrogenous, potash, and phosphate fertilizers (including ground rock phosphate). Traditional nutrients--animal and plant manures--are not included. For the purpose of data dissemination, FAO has adopted the concept of a calendar year (January to December). Some countries compile fertilizer data on a calendar year basis, while others are on a split-year basis. Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.