Iran vs Zimbabwe: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Iran
31.58
in 2014
Zimbabwe
29.43
in 2014
Iran rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
121st
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Iran
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Iran currently reports 31.58 against 29.43 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.15.
That makes Iran's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Iran has been ahead every year.
Iran ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 161 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.21 | 28.8 | 63.41 | Iran |
| 2010s | 37.18 | 27.9 | 9.28 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Iran or Zimbabwe?
- Iran, at 31.58 against 29.43 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Iran and Zimbabwe?
- 2.15, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Iran and Zimbabwe rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Iran ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.