Eritrea vs Uganda: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Eritrea
0.6768
in 2014
Uganda
1.7
in 2014
Eritrea rank
161st
Uganda rank
158th
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Eritrea
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 1.7 against 0.6768 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.02.
That makes Uganda's figure about 2.5 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 158th of 161 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.35 | 1.41 | 0.9387 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.8058 | 1.87 | 1.06 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Eritrea or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 1.7 against 0.6768 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Eritrea and Uganda?
- 1.02, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Uganda rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Eritrea ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 158th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.