Cuba vs South Africa: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Cuba
58.21
in 2014
South Africa
60.6
in 2014
Cuba rank
100th
South Africa rank
98th
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Cuba
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 60.6 against 58.21 in Cuba, a difference of 2.39.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 98th of 161 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.06 | 57.98 | 29.92 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 44.12 | 58.39 | 14.28 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Cuba or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 60.6 against 58.21 in Cuba as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Cuba and South Africa?
- 2.39, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Africa?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Cuba and South Africa rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Cuba ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 98th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.