Chile vs New Caledonia: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Chile
343.34
in 2014
New Caledonia
287.34
in 2014
Chile rank
22nd
New Caledonia rank
23rd
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Chile
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 343.34 against 287.34 in New Caledonia, a difference of 56.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 22nd and New Caledonia ranks 23rd of 161 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 484.2 | 264.67 | 219.53 | Chile |
| 2010s | 409.69 | 222.07 | 187.62 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Chile or New Caledonia?
- Chile, at 343.34 against 287.34 in New Caledonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Chile and New Caledonia?
- 56, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Chile ranks 22nd and New Caledonia ranks 23rd of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.